Timeline for Response to "Quels sont ..." with subclause
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 20:58 | vote | accept | user11550 | ||
| Jan 16, 2017 at 19:29 | comment | added | Frank | Yes, you are right actually, and I took it out from my answer. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 19:29 | history | edited | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 18:51 | comment | added | user11550 | If you just write "la chanteuse est magnifique et qu'il va faire beau ce soir.", shouldn't you leave out the "que" in "qu'il"? | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 16:21 | history | edited | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 16:14 | comment | added | Frank | You can use "les raisons sont que..." for formal writing, but it sounds like you are doing a mechanical exercise :-) nothing wrong, but a native author of a book might not say that. He might just write: "la chanteuse est magnifique et qu'il va faire beau ce soir." - I think that would completely work in writing. | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 16:12 | history | edited | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Jan 16, 2017 at 16:07 | comment | added | user11550 | Ok sure, I get your point if this is everyday conversation. What if it's formal writing? | |
| Jan 16, 2017 at 16:06 | history | answered | Frank | CC BY-SA 3.0 |