Skip to main content
Commonmark migration
Source Link
  1. I can see that it's elevated language, but I didn't know you could use the words that way. I know what it means, but it's really rare even for literary style.

    I can see that it's elevated language, but I didn't know you could use the words that way. I know what it means, but it's really rare even for literary style.

    I don't know if that qualifies as "natural" or not, a lot of literary stuff would feel super weird said in a verbal conversation.

  2. Yes, (A) and (B) are not linked by anything grammatical whatsoever.

I don't know if that qualifies as "natural" or not, a lot of literary stuff would feel super weird said in a verbal conversation.

  1. Yes, (A) and (B) are not linked by anything grammatical whatsoever.
  1. I can see that it's elevated language, but I didn't know you could use the words that way. I know what it means, but it's really rare even for literary style.

I don't know if that qualifies as "natural" or not, a lot of literary stuff would feel super weird said in a verbal conversation.

  1. Yes, (A) and (B) are not linked by anything grammatical whatsoever.
  1. I can see that it's elevated language, but I didn't know you could use the words that way. I know what it means, but it's really rare even for literary style.

    I don't know if that qualifies as "natural" or not, a lot of literary stuff would feel super weird said in a verbal conversation.

  2. Yes, (A) and (B) are not linked by anything grammatical whatsoever.

Source Link
Teleporting Goat
  • 12.6k
  • 25
  • 49

  1. I can see that it's elevated language, but I didn't know you could use the words that way. I know what it means, but it's really rare even for literary style.

I don't know if that qualifies as "natural" or not, a lot of literary stuff would feel super weird said in a verbal conversation.

  1. Yes, (A) and (B) are not linked by anything grammatical whatsoever.