Timeline for Non-misogynistic way to say “asshole”?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2021 at 7:53 | comment | added | Mogu | @jlliagre Oops, I missed that first comment. I see your point, although i'd stress that It's only kind of similar of using nègre to name a ghostwriter. | |
| Feb 9, 2021 at 21:09 | comment | added | jlliagre | @Mogu This has already been expressed in Laurent S' comment to the OP question and 19 people agree so far. The study I provided a link to states that connasse appears in 16% of mysogynistic insults. It is also very possible that people using connasse do not realize its mysogynistic nature. It's kind of similar of using nègre to name a ghostwriter. Even if people using it have no racism in mind, the impact is there. | |
| Feb 9, 2021 at 20:49 | history | edited | jlliagre | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 29 characters in body
|
| Feb 9, 2021 at 20:40 | comment | added | Mogu | For what it's worth, I don't think "connasse" is particularly misogynistic in most usages. Certainly not in all those I have encountered. Sounds completely symmetrical to "connard", afaic (native speaker). | |
| Jun 18, 2019 at 20:39 | comment | added | jlliagre | @m.raynal C'est un merde would not work indeed but C'est une trou du cul doesn't seem to hurt ears, There are many c'est une trou du cul on the web. Feel free to use whatever gender you like anyway ;-) | |
| Jun 18, 2019 at 14:27 | comment | added | m.raynal |
I'd rather go for c'est un trou du cul, the same way we can say of a man c'est une merde.
|
|
| Jun 17, 2019 at 18:58 | history | edited | user19187 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Italiques. Bloc de citation précédé par le deux-points. Si tu préfères les guillemets, stp modifier.
|
| Jun 17, 2019 at 17:50 | history | edited | jlliagre | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 802 characters in body
|
| Jun 17, 2019 at 9:52 | history | answered | jlliagre | CC BY-SA 4.0 |