I thought it should be “Je viens du acheter”. Is it because “acheter” has a vowel at the beginning?

  • 1
    Note that venir de is followed by an infinitive, thus it's acheter and not acheté. Also, there's an s in je viens (most irregular verbs take an s in the first and second person in the indicative present singular). Commented Dec 9, 2011 at 21:40

3 Answers 3


De le becomes du only when le is an article, meaning "the". In this case le is a pronoun, meaning "it" (the book).

  • 2
    Notice that even when le is an article, if an elision is expected, de le becomes de l'. Commented Jan 21, 2013 at 22:18

This sentence contains the particle de (part of the verb venir de) followed by the personal pronoun l' followed by the verb acheter. The usual form of this pronoun is le when referring to a masculine noun, and la when referring to a feminine noun. However, when the article is followed by a word that begins with a vowel, the pronoun is always elided to l'. The form l' exists for both genders.

This elision is also done when le or la is a definite article: le matin, la nuit, l'après-midi. It is also done when le or la is part of a partitive article: du pain, de la confiture, de l'eau.

Now let's suppose the verb didn't start with a vowel: “je viens de le vendre”. Why don't we say “je viens du vendre”? There are two cases where de le contracts into du:

  • When it is a partitive article (i.e. it means “some amount of”), as in du pain.
  • When it the preposition de is introducing a noun group that begins with the definite article le, as in “je descend du train” (“je descend de la voiture”).

On the other hand, there is no contraction when de and le happen to be next to each other but they do not form a single unit. Here, de is part of the verbal compound venir de and le is a personal pronoun which forms a complement of this verb. There is no contraction when le is a pronoun: “je viens de le vendre”.

  • 1
    In Je parle du vélo du facteur hidden de-s are not partitive, but general prepositions. The true condition for the possibledu contraction depends on the nature of le, which is either an article or a pronoun. Commented Jan 21, 2013 at 22:07

You are right about the vowel part, consider these two examples:

Du pain (instead of "de le pain")


De l'alcool ("alcool" is also masculine, yet "du alcool" is incorrect)

However, in your example the words "de" and "l'" are not linked at all, so you can't replace them by "du".

Consider these two examples:

Je viens de manger. (I just ate.)

Here "de" isn't quantitative but is used to introduce another subsentence, here "manger".

Je l'ai acheté. (I bought it.)

So they have no relation, and you can't say, for example:

Je viens du lire. (wrong)

But you need to say:

Je viens de le lire. (I just read it.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.