4

Je dois quand même avouer qu'il m'a fait vivre des choses à côté desquelles j'aurais pu passer.

I express this sentence in English as follows, and I suppose that « desquelles » serves the function of "that". But beyond that, I don’t know why the plain and simple « que » cannot be used here.

"But I have to admit that thanks to him I’ve been able to experience some things close by that I might otherwise have missed out on."

Improve this question

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
7

The sentence is "passer à côté de [quelque chose]", which, in English, is "to pass by [something]". It means, in this context, "to miss out on something". It is an integral part of the expression; in your translation you translated that part by "close by" which is not correct, it goes with "miss out on".

The "[quelque chose]" is, here, the relative pronoun "lesquelles". In English you would translate it by "which" or "that". It is contracted with "des" to produce "desquelles = des + lesquelles", exactly like "de + les = des".

Simply using "que" would have been incorrect here: "passer à côté" can only take an indirect complement. You cannot say "je suis passé à côté toi", you must say "je suis passé à côté de toi" (I passed by you).

So a correct translation of the second part becomes:

But I have to admit that thanks to him I've been able to experience some things that I might otherwise have missed out on.

PS: Maybe the French sentence is easier to parse (but doesn't really sound good) if you split it in half:

Je dois quand même avouer qu'il m'a fait vivre des choses. J'aurai pu passer à côté de ces choses.

I have to admit that thanks to him I've been able to experience some things. I might have missed out on those things otherwise.

Improve this answer
4
  • Thanks. Is the use of "dont" incorrect as well? « Je dois quand même avouer qu'il m'a fait vivre des choses dont j'aurais pu passer à côté. »
    – Con-gras-tue-les-chiens
    May 30, 2016 at 16:05
  • 1
    @MasonH.Hatfield Dont can be a plural. I can't think of any singular/plural distinction in the usage of dont. In this sentence, it wouldn't work in the singular either: “il m'a fait vivre une chose dont j'aurais pu passer à côté” sounds just as wrong (it should be “… une chose à côté de laquelle j'aurais pu passer”). (I think that some French people might use *dont in informal speech though.)
    – Gilles 'SO nous est hostile'
    May 30, 2016 at 20:27
  • 3
    @LUNA You can't use dont here. I had to look up why: TLF 1.I.B.a.α. If dont would be a complement of a noun that is itself has a preposition before it, then we use duquel (and feminine/plural variants) instead.
    – Gilles 'SO nous est hostile'
    May 30, 2016 at 20:31
  • @Gilles Yes, you are correct. It is my mistake. Example: Voici les clés dont elles ont besoin.
    – Mason H. Hatfield
    May 31, 2016 at 3:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.