1

I just asked a related question, and in German, it is not entirely clear what two consecutive relative pronouns "was" each qualify.

{German}: Es gibt nichts, was er sagen könnte, was die Tatsache ändern oder auch nur rechtfertigen würde.


In English, on the other hand, two relative pronouns do not seem to give rise to ambiguity, especially since the first "that" can be omitted.

{English}: There's nothing (that) he could say that would change or justify the fact.


Then I wondered how I would express the same idea in French, and the following construction came to mind first. I notice I kind of finessed the issue of a relative pronoun pile-up by not using the second one.

{French}: Rien de ce qu’il dirait ne pourrait changer ou justifier ce qui a été fait.


But in spontaneous speech, you cannot always start a sentence ideally and yet might try to construct the rest of the sentence somehow with what you have started.

So what if you start off with "Il n'y a rien ..." instead and need to incorporate two relative pronouns somehow, just as is the case with the German and English sentences?

This might prove to be a more complex structure than the one I suggested above, but how would you go about it without causing ambiguity?

Il n'y a rien ... {with two relative pronouns}

3

These two would work:

  • Il n'y a rien qu'il pourrait dire pour changer ou justifier ce qui a été fait.

  • Il n'y a rien qu'il pourrait dire qui changerait ou justifierait ce qui a été fait.

  • Merci! Regarding your second suggestion, this is exactly what I was pondering on. The first "que" obviously refers to "rien", but I wonder if the second one leaves some ambiguity as to what it qualifies? I assume it qualifies the entire "rien qu'il pourrait dire" rather than "rien"? – Con-gras-tue-les-chiens Apr 16 '17 at 0:50
  • It is absolutely unambiguous. Qui is put in place of everything and anything that he could say (including any utter non-sense gibberish that he could come up with), and rien specifies that none of all these could ever work to change or justify what has been done. – ﺪﺪﺪ Apr 16 '17 at 1:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.