3

I have the following passage, written by Émilie du Châtelet in 1738:

Il me paroît que le Lecteur est un peu étonné de se trouver tout d'un coup dans la question la plus difficile de l'optique, pour la solution de laquelle il ne faut pas moins que la Métaphysique la plus recherchée.

I believe I understand the meaning but would like to check because "il faut" constructions are always throwing me off. According to this post, it seems that the "pas moins" is an addition made for emphasis that doesn't actually change the meaning; the "pas" goes with "moins," not with "ne." In other words, saying "il ne faut que la Métaphysique" would mean the same thing.

My translation would be something like, "the solution of which requires the most thoroughly investigated metaphysics," or more colloquially, "which only the most thorougly investigated metaphysics could resolve."

I appreciate any thoughts about this construction or my translation.

|improve this question
  • Your proposed translations are not totally literal, but do capture a good part of the original, and stand well on their own. My answer below is certainly not as delicately crafted as them, but it sticks perhaps a bit closer to the original... – Montée de lait Apr 4 '18 at 14:18
  • @Feelew Yes, very nice; they are helpful to get the exact or more literal rendering. – twoblackboxes Apr 5 '18 at 16:37
2

"Il ne faut pas moins que" means precisely that, and would be said "Il faut au moins" in current French, which translates in English to "It requires at least".

|improve this answer
2

A more accurate and native translation than those so far proposed would be:

It appears to me that the Reader is a bit surprised to find (himself/herself) all of a sudden into the most difficult question optics can bring, for which a solution requires nothing less than the most subtle Metaphysics.

It is certainly not yet perfect, since I am not native English (but rather native French), but it should capture the full meaning of the sentence in a way nearly digestible for an English native speaker.

The original:

Il me paroît que le Lecteur est un peu étonné de se trouver tout d'un coup dans la question la plus difficile de l'optique, pour la solution de laquelle il ne faut pas moins que la Métaphysique la plus recherchée.

|improve this answer
1

As it is related to metaphysic, let me answer with some rudimentary mathematics:

moins que (less than) : - (minus)

pas moins que (not less than) : not -, so => (greater than or equal to)

You can understand it as « Il faut au moins (au minimum) la Métaphysique la plus recherchée ».

It means that to answer this question, it will be necessary to make important research in metaphysics.

|improve this answer
0

It's a complex sentence; I will try to interpret (not translate) as best as I can.

It seems that the reader is astounded to find himself suddenly with the most difficult question that the eye can meet, which the answer requires nonetheless the most advanced metaphysical knowledge.

Translation in this case might confuse you.

|improve this answer

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.