I am currently learning French on Duolingo, and during one of the exercises, I came across the following sentence:

Je parle de leurs éléphants. (Taken from Duolingo)

The problem is that the recording does not have proper liaisons, and without the liaisons, I could not tell whether they were talking about a single elephant or multiple elephants. I would like to know that are there any other clues in this statement that reveal to a listener that the speaker had multiple elephants in mind. I would greatly appreciate your response.

  • 3
    Sans les liaisons, tu ne peux pas savoir. May 2, 2018 at 17:29

1 Answer 1


Are there any other clues the speaker had multiple elephants in mind?

Certainly not. Proper liaison is the only clue.

The oral version of a sentence without liaison (Je parle de leurs téléphones) is 100% ambiguous.

Four strategies to resolve the ambiguity in cases like this:

  • Context. From what you know, do they jointly own an elephant or do they have a herd?

  • Agreement. Listen for an adjective that differs in the plural (éléphant royal / éléphants royaux) or a verb that does the same (éléphant qui boit / éléphants qui boivent).

  • Ask. « Parles-tu d'un seul éléphant ou de plusieurs ? »

  • Echo. When you talk about the same subject, choose an unambiguous wording (Donc, pour les éléphants ...) so they can straighten it out if you're wrong.

Though I love Duolingo, none of these options is possible with their isolated sentence system.

Edit: I should add that as far as I know, this liaison is not optional, as a determiner + noun. Perhaps Duolingo's text-to-speech system is at fault. Or maybe that rule is not always followed in practice.

  • If I do not get a better response within a day or two, I would accept your answer as the correct answer.
    – Irfan
    May 2, 2018 at 17:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.