3

McWhorter, J. PhD Linguistics (Stanford). The Power of Babel (2003). p. 32 Bottom.

  Semantic drift has an especially visible effect on combinations of roots and prefixes or suffixes, and this effect, too, creates important differences between a language and the one it turns into. Our French sentence’s admettez-le “ admit it” is a good example of this kind of development. Admettre is composed of ad-, a preservation of the full word or prefix for “to” in Latin, and mettre “ to put.” This verb had an ancestor in Latin, but this Latin verb admittere did not mean “ to confess,” which was conveyed with other verbs like agnoscere. Instead, the main meaning of admittere was the literal one of “ putting or sending into.” 'The “ confess” meaning of its French descendant arrived gradually by the same kind of hanging implication that created French’s have-perfect: to admit something is to give it entree into—that is, “put it into”—your acknowledged awareness. [My emboldening]

I understand that “admettre” originally signfied “put to”, but how did it generalize to: put to “your acknowledged awareness”? The author doesn't expound.

Put to itself doesn't suggest “your acknowledged awareness”. One can “put to” many other things, if this makes sense. So what narrowed put to to “your acknowledged awareness”?

3

I'm by no mean linguist, but being french I may be able to help.

I think to confess is a misleading translation, I can't think of a sentence where it could be exactly used as such. The closest would be "Admettre ses erreurs" (To admit/accept/acknowledge your errors); which is more introspective than confessing.

A better example of "to give entree into your acknowledged awareness" would be the use of admettre to accept something as true:

"J'admets que tu as raison" (I admit you are right)

You can also use it before an hypothesis at the start of a sentence; to signify we consider this hypothesis as true:

  • "Admettons que tu arrives à 20h chez moi, on aura jamais le temps d'y être à 20h30!" (Let's say you arrive at my place at 20h, we won't have time to be there at 20h30!)
  • "Si on admet que le voyage dans le temps est possible, pourquoi ne pas tuer les parents de Sarah Connor ?" (Let's say time travel is possible, why not killing Sarah Connor's parents ?)

Hope this helped.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.