I came across the sentence 'Ils n'ont plus qu'a attendre le prochaine',(in regards to a family who has missed their train) If 'plus' were removed, I understand the meaning would be something along the lines of, 'they only have to wait for the next one.' What function, then, does 'plus' have in the sentence.


  • You write : If plus were removed, I understand the meaning... : They only have to wait. Well not exactly. If plus is removed, then the meaning is they just have to wait actually. With the addition of plus then the meaning becomes they only have to wait.
    – MC68020
    Sep 16, 2018 at 15:36
  • By "they only have to wait for the next one," (what you state is your general understanding of the meaning without "plus"), do you mean something like "What's the big deal, they [will] only have to wait for the next one?" If that is the case, then @aCOSwt is probably right in saying that "just" would be a better choice than "only," but I think that your use of "only" here to express this feeling of "What's the big deal?" is fine. (All that to say that I think there's more to it than simply the difference in English between the near-synonyms "only" and "just."
    – Papa Poule
    Sep 16, 2018 at 16:28
  • "only" and "just" are synonymous in this context :p
    – Luke Sawczak
    Sep 17, 2018 at 1:07
  • Note that in casual spoken French, you are more likely to hear : y z'ont pu qu'à attendre le prochain
    – jlliagre
    Sep 17, 2018 at 9:15

2 Answers 2


You're correct that normally, ne ... que means "only, just, nothing but".

Ils n'ont qu'à attendre le prochain.

They just have to wait for the next one.

And in isolation, ne ... plus means "no longer, not anymore".

Ils n'ont plus à attendre le prochain.

They no longer have to wait for the next one.

Now to combine them! I understand why you would find this tricky. To capture it in English, I would probably select the "nothing but" variant for ne ... que and add a couple of words to clarify:

Ils n'ont plus qu'à attendre le prochain.

They no longer have to do anything but wait for the next one.

If my translation style emphasized dynamic equivalence over formal equivalence, I would rephrase the above something like this:

All they have to do now is wait for the next one.

Now they just have to wait for the next one.


First, note that the correct sentence is “Ils n'ont plus qu'à attendre le prochain”. The word a is the third person indicative singular of the verb avoir, the word à is a preposition. The noun train is masculine, thus it's “le prochain”; for a feminine noun it would be “la prochaine”.

Regarding the negation, recall that the basic form of negation in French is ne … pas. The adverb pas can be replaced by other adverbs to indicate a specific form of negation: jamais = never, rien = nothing, plus = no longer, … It's possible to combine multiple adverbs, e.g. “ne … jamais rien” = “nothing ever” or “never anything”, “ne … plus rien” = “no longer anything” or “nothing any longer”, …

In French, “only” can be expressed with a form of negation: ne … que. Think of it as “nothing except …” or “nothing but …” or “nothing other than …”.

Je n'entends que les oiseaux qui chantent.   (I hear nothing but the birds singing.)
Il n'y a qu'un train par jour.   (There is only one train per day.)

This can be combined with other negation adverbs.

Il n'y a jamais eu qu'un train par jour.   (There has only ever been one train per day.)
Depuis le changement d'horaires, il n'y a plus qu'un train par jour.   (Since the service schedule change, there is only one train left per day.)

Independently, there is an idiom “n'avoir qu'à”. “X n'a qu'à faire Y” can have several slightly different meanings: it can mean that X only needs to do Y (in order for something else to happen), or that it is enough for X to do Y, or that X should do Y, or that the only solution is for X to do Y.

The sentence “Ils n'ont plus qu'à attendre le prochain” uses this idiom in the sense “the only solution”. The only solution, now that the previous train has departed, is for them to take the next one. The adverb plus indicates that the statement is relative to some past event. The contrast is slight, but there is a difference between “Ils n'ont qu'à attendre le prochain” and “Ils n'ont plus qu'à attendre le prochain”. Without plus, the meaning is more “they should wait for the next one”. With plus, the meaning is more “the only solution is for them to wait for the next one”, because plus anchors the statement to the cause of the problem which is that they've missed the previous train.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.