Timeline for Accord de l'article défini pour un adverbe au superlatif
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2022 at 15:15 | history | edited | LPH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 364 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2022 at 12:59 | history | edited | LPH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 364 characters in body
|
| Sep 21, 2022 at 12:59 | history | edited | LPH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 364 characters in body
|
| Sep 20, 2022 at 6:14 | comment | added | LPH | @LukeSawczak It seems to me that the idea of genderlessness has no incidence on the decision for the adjective/participle. All that is determining is the rule concerning the comparison (which I thought you knew for its essential part (or I would have added it): stated roughly, comparison of the degrees over several beings makes agreement necessary, comparison over a single being makes for agreement (genderlessess)). So the genderlessness of the phrase has no meaning and in the case of modification of a noun ("la phrase ... tournée") there is no adverbial phrase. | |
| Sep 20, 2022 at 1:44 | comment | added | Luke Sawczak♦ | The follow-up question, then, would be whether you could ever conceive of a passive past participle as consistent with this kind of adverbial phrase (or, more to the point, whether one could ever be genderless in the superlative). | |
| Sep 20, 2022 at 0:39 | history | answered | LPH | CC BY-SA 4.0 |