Skip to main content
added 11 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Toto
  • 15k
  • 8
  • 38
  • 62

I am learning the difference between le plus-que-parfait and le conditionnel passpassé and I am a little confused

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: 

Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!

I am learning the difference between le plus-que-parfait and le conditionnel pass and I am a little confused

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!

I am learning the difference between le plus-que-parfait and le conditionnel passé and I am a little confused

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: 

Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!4l

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!4l

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!

Source Link

I am learning the difference between le plus-que-parfait and le conditionnel pass and I am a little confused

As the title states, I am a little confused! I am working on some practice questions and the question asks: Mettez les verbes entre parenthèses au plus-que-parfait ou au conditionnel passé.

1 )Si tu (s'amuser) au match de hockey, tu (ne pas entrer) tôt.

I am not sure how I can make sense of that using either tense. I have taken a guess with:

Si tu t'étais amusé au match de hockey, tu n'aurais pas pu entrer plus tôt.

But that still doesn't make much sense! I would greatly appreciate anyone who could clarify this question for me and help me understand how they got to their answer!4l