In this line from the poem "Tête de faune" by Rimbaud, how do I know who "recueille"? Is it "le Baiser" or "le Bois"? To whom does the "qui" refer?

If it is refering the "Bois", how do I refer to the "Baiser"?

  • 3
    More context is needed ; to identify clearly what is meant by this expression provide enough sentences before and what comes after; otherwise give an explanation.
    – LPH
    Sep 15, 2019 at 5:49
  • @LPH This poem by Rimbaud is easily found on the internet, this is the version the OP refers to, but two different versions have been published, here is the other one. This is important to note as there is a coma in one and not in the other.
    – None
    Sep 15, 2019 at 9:34

2 Answers 2


This is something that is determined by context. Relative pronouns such as qui can modify an entire phrasal noun or just part of it. Some examples taken from « Les Chansons de Bilitis » :

  • « Je te bercerai d’une main sur mon genou qui se lève et s’abaisse. » : The relative clause is clearly attached to « mon genou » and not « une main sur mon genou » by context.

  • « Quand aurai-je comme toi des seins de jeune fille qui gonflent la robe et tentent le baiser ? » : The relative clause is clearly attached to « des seins de jeune fille » and not « jeune fille » as the verbs are conjugated in the plural. The « jeune fille » is also by context an inappropriate subject for the verbs.

In this example from Rimbaud, « se recueillir » probably refers to « le Baiser ». This is indicated clearly in the translations of the poem that I found while looking for references:

And the Golden Kiss of the Woods, started by a bullfinch, resolves once again to rest. (Mason)

And one sees frightened by a bullfinch the Golden Kiss of the Woods, communing with itself. (Ahearn)

… and you can see frightened by a bullfinch the golden Kiss of the Woods, in meditation. (Appelbaum)

One might also observe that in the clause, « le Baiser d'or du Bois » is already treated as a unit by « l'on voit épeuré ». Because of this precedent and the comma, which implies a pause to me, « qui se recueille » probably also applies to the entire phrasal noun. If it were instead attached to « le Bois », I would expect it to more or less proceed without a break, to make the attachment clearer.

et l'on voit épeuré par un bouvreuil
le Baiser d'or du Bois, qui se recueille.


There are two known versions of this poem Tête de faune by Rimbaud, the version you refer to, with a comma before se recueille is from a manuscript by Rimbaud. The version published in les Poètes maudits has no comma.

I personally do not think the place of the comma changes the way we should interpret this line but I agree with Maroon's answer saying that it is the Baiser d'or who is the subject of recueillir.

My own interpretation of the poem is that Le baiser at the start is asleep (le baiser dort, line 3). While the baiser (to me it personifies the poet but other interpretations are possible of course) is asleep the faun arrives and kisses the red flowers. Amidst the faun's intervention the baiser – who by the last line of the poem is referred to as le Baiser d'or – remains asleep, or at least half asleep (→ il se recueille).

But as I said other interpretations are possible as this one given here :

Suite à [l'acte du faune], le bois se pâme dans une longue extase (dernier vers : « Le Baiser d’or du Bois, qui se recueille. »)1

1 After the faun has perpetrated his act the wood swoons into a long ecstasy (my translation).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.